In reply to James B.. It's NORTHROP GRUMMAN not Northrup Grumman. Never heard of ...
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21667
In reply to James B.. I agree that is the standard needed for success. As an avia...
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21664
In reply to 1twothree4. Northrup Grumman Corporation.
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21656
In reply to Leatherstocking. We just need unmanned systems that can operate witho...
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21655
In reply to vincedc. Who or what is Northrup?
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21281
We've gained valuable information from the X-47B effort and it's time to move on. Ray Mabus' comments about the timeframe of UAS replacing manned aircraft is an example of "fighting the last war"...
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21201
Anybody get the feeling that there is a lobbyist from Northrup trying to keep this project alive.
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21189
Its the essence of 'requirements creep' - I don't care if you have no cost-effective plans that can be demonstrated; do something cool and oh no additional money is available so take that out of ...
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/01/forbes-calls-on-secnav-mabus-to-extend-x-47b-testing#comment-21126