Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not. …. I have second thoughts. Maybe God is malicious. Albert Einstein If one accepts the hypothesis of intelligent design, one might reasonably conclud...
http://theskepticalzone.com/wp/malicious-intelligent-design/
I have been having an exchange with Upright Biped here about his perception of how his “semiotic theory of Intelligent Design” has fared among sceptics. In the hope that he will be prepar...
http://theskepticalzone.com/wp/upright-bipeds-semiotic-theory-redux/
Upright Biped, Before fleeing the discussion in July, you spent months here at TSZ discussing your “Semiotic Theory of ID”. During that time we all struggled with your vague prose, and you we...
http://theskepticalzone.com/wp/a-repeated-challenge-to-upright-biped/
As Upright BiPed is only here occasionally, I’ve unstickied the Semiotic theory of ID thread, and I’m posting this one as a breadcrumb trail (i.e. click on the link to find it). Please cont...
Upright BiPed has been proposing what he has called a “semiotic” theory of Intelligent Design, for a while, which I have found confusing, to say the least. However, he is honing his case, a...
In a post here at Uncommon Descent, Upright Biped makes what he calls his Semiotic Argument for Design, which he has been challenging me to refute for some time now, but which I have been struggl...
http://theskepticalzone.com/wp/upright-bipeds-semiotic-argument-for-design/
I’m starting off this blog with a post about an interesting discussion I’ve been having* on on the Uncommon Descent blog about the claim, frequently made by Intelligent Design proponents, tha...