Unable to connect, retrying...
Online collaborative whiteboard. Powerful, engaging with timer, emoji's, commenting and voting.
Search for RSS feeds

District Court of New Jersey Declines CAFA Jurisdiction In ...l” Pursuant To CAFA’s “Interests of Justice” Exception

Roberts v. Tribeca Automotive, Inc., 2019 WL 522127 (D.N.J. February 11, 2019) In this action, the District Court of New Jersey adopted a magistrate’s recommendation which granted the plaintiff...

https://www.cafalawblog.com/case-summaries/district-court-of-new-jersey-declines-cafa-jurisdiction-in-a-matter-that-is-uniquely-local-pursuant-to-cafas-interests-of-justice-exception

Burden Of Proof Of A Party Invoking The Local Controversy E...A “Preponderance” – Or More Than 50% – Of The Evidence

McAllister v. The St. Louis Rams, LLC, No. 4:16-cv-00172 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 12, 2018). In this action, while remanding a case to state court, a district court in Missouri found that the plaintiffs�...

https://www.cafalawblog.com/case-summaries/burden-of-proof-of-a-party-invoking-the-local-controversy-exception-is-by-a-preponderance-or-more-than-50-of-the-evidence

Statistical Assumptions, if Based in Reason, May be Used to... CAFA’s Amount-In-Controversy Requirement Has Been Satisfied

Allred v. Kellogg_Company, et al., 2018 WL 332904 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2018). A California district court denied the plaintiff’s motion to remand, holding that the statistical assumptions used in...

https://www.cafalawblog.com/case-summaries/statistical-assumptions-if-based-in-reason-may-be-used-to-prove-that-cafas-amount-in-controversy-requirement-has-been-satisfied