An excerpt from the original essay in his posthumous book “The Point of It All.”
An excerpt from the forthcoming posthumous book “The Point of It All.”
A message from Charles Krauthammer
From the generals to the Boy Scouts, institutions are withstanding Trump.
From the generals to the Boy Scouts, institutions are withstanding Trump.
Trump’s attacks on his attorney general show his pathological need to display dominance.
Trump’s attacks on his attorney general show his pathological need to display dominance.
One cannot imagine a more wrenching moral dilemma.
One cannot imagine a more wrenching moral dilemma.
What Trump Jr., et al. did may not be criminal. But it is deeply wrong.
What Trump Jr., et al. did may not be criminal. But it is deeply wrong.
Kim Jong Un has an intercontinental weapon. What do we have?
Kim Jong Un has an intercontinental weapon. What do we have?
The Krauthammer Conjecture: Winning isn’t everything — but losing is a lot worse.
The Krauthammer Conjecture: Winning isn’t everything — but losing is a lot worse.
Everyone knows that the Islamic State is finished. Who inherits?
Everyone knows that the Islamic State is finished. Who inherits?
Trump’s “unfiltered” tweets blur lines between policy and pathology.
Trump’s “unfiltered” tweets blur lines between policy and pa�thol�ogy.
By abdicating America’s defensive commitment to NATO, Trump has dangerously undermined global security.
The epic Sunni-Shiite war is at the center of the crisis shaking the Middle East today.
The epic Sunni-Shiite war is at the center of the crisis shaking the Middle East today.
But removing him by way of the 25th Amendment would be the most destabilizing event in American political history.
But removing him by way of the 25th Amendment would be the most destabilizing event in American political history.
There were plenty of reasons to fire James Comey — just not the one President Trump has given.
What happens when the phone rings in the Oval Office at 3 a.m.?
Don’t mistake the results of the French presidential election for a sign that populism is abating.
The nuclear threat from the regime is growing. But the United States is far from helpless.
The Trump administration has done a foreign policy about-face.
For Democrats it’s payback time for Harry Reid’s reckless abolition of the filibuster on judicial appointees.
We’re on it. But there’s still time to revisit a more ambitious repeal-and-replace plan.
The good news is that our checks and balances are working just fine.
Republicans are learning that entitlements are hard to take away.
Washington has worked itself into a frenzy over two different conjectures.
A process to counter executive willfulness.
Maybe there are benefits to the Trump administration’s two-track, two-reality foreign policy.
Flynn’s calls with the Russian ambassador broke no laws. So why did he lie about them?
It caused enormous disruption without making us any safer.
He guaranteed Neil Gorsuch’s elevation to the Supreme Court.
The president’s isolationist agenda breaks from 70 years of precedent.
Two of his parting shots were particularly shocking.
Trump is wearing out his welcome, and he hasn’t even taken office.
North Korea, a highly erratic and often irrational regime, is acquiring the capacity to destroy an American city by missile.
The U.N. Security Council’s condemnation of Israeli settlements flies in the face of four decades of U.S. diplomacy.
For the first time in four decades, the United States is an irrelevance in the Middle East.
Will his picks to lead federal agencies be the ultimate rebuttal of Obama’s executive-branch overreach?
The president-elect should focus less on Twitter and more on the lawmakers who can actually get something done.
An era of autocracy looms.
Their doctrine of tribalism at home and universalism abroad is finished.
The Reaganite and populist elements in the party need to be willing to advance each other’s goals.
Comey’s announcement brought flooding back every unsavory element of Clinton’s character. But it still doesn’t make Trump fit to be president.
The president could try to force a two-state solution before he leaves office.
The WikiLeaks disclosures make the case against Hillary Clinton even more clear.
In the United States, we don’t persecute political opponents. Donald Trump doesn’t seem to understand that.
The two central pillars of his presidency are collapsing before our eyes.
This election has been marked by outlandish distortions, hype and blatant disregard for the truth.
Instead of dwelling on his old mistakes, Trump continually creates new Trumps.
Obama’s humiliation in China is a sign of global disdain for the president.
If Trump were to acquiesce on legalization, he might seal an artful deal on border enforcement.
Newly released State Department-Clinton Foundation emails reinforce Hillary Clinton’s sorry pattern of playing fast and loose with ethical standards.
Obama shows little concern about Russian success in the Middle East and Europe.
This fan is waiting for his favorite games to begin in November.
The GOP nominee badly needs to do what outsider Reagan accomplished in 1980: pass the threshold test for acceptability.
“The best darn change maker” is not a sufficiently inspiring counter to Donald Trump’s anxiety-stirring vision of a way of life in peril.
One was Cruz’s refusal to endorse Trump; the other was more subtle, led by the unenthusiastic McConnell and Ryan.
The troop deployments to Eastern Europe announced at the NATO summit in Warsaw were an achievement.
Why did the FBI director let Hillary Clinton off the hook?
Scotland and Northern Ireland might emulate Britain’s understandable self-assertion.
Trapped by circumstance, she is the status quo candidate of uninspired incrementalism.
The presumptive GOP candidate shows no signs of turning presidential.
One can be appalled by Donald Trump but understand why the House speaker would support him.
Sanders won’t win, but he will shape the Democratic party platform.
President Obama leaves a dual legacy on foreign policy, one of idealism tempered by realpolitik.
We are unlikely to go the next six months without a significant crisis. How will the candidates react?
Donald Trump and the GOP don’t care about principle.
His version of America First is a jumbled and dangerous foreign policy mess.
It’s spring. It’s warm. There’s baseball. There’s Bryce Harper.
The center-left, triangulating, New Democrat (Bill) Clintonism of the 1990s is dead.
If Trump loses out at the convention, a party split is guaranteed.
Here is the range of bad choices: pacifist, internationalist, unilateralist and mercantilist.
The president’s muted response to the attacks is difficult to fathom.
It’s being fueled on both sides: one through anti-free-speech agitation; the other side by threats.
Bernie Sanders’s sincere, revealing answer.
It turns out evangelicals won’t turn out for Ted Cruz.
Russia, China and Iran are on the march, yet the president focuses on Cuba and climate change.
The preservation of Justice Antonin Scalia’s legacy will be pinned to the outcome of the 2016 election.
This season’s politics of fantasy have their roots in the Obama presidency.
Cruz and Rubio practice two different versions of conservatism. But Trump is not a conservative at all.
Could a full-scale Republican riot upend a century of conservativism?
The problems lie in the nuclear agreement and Iran’s return to prominence on the world stage.
In his final State of the Union address, Obama served up old rhetoric and tired promises.
Iran test-fires nuclear-capable missiles, but the Obama administration barely responds.
The United States is a spacefaring nation again thanks to the likes of Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos.
Sometimes, you just have to break the dietary rules and hope for the best.
So what if the climate deal and Iran deal aren’t actual agreements? Obama needs accomplishments.
His would-be Muslim ban is an impractical, absurd distraction from real issues.
The debate has become a national disgrace.
The president is more interested in fighting Republicans than the Islamic State.
Republican candidates begin leaving the entertainment phase and entering the serious season.
The GOP presidential candidates squander their victory over CNBC by debating room temperature.