In reply to Philipp. Great to hear it works now!
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-427766
In reply to lukaseder. Hello Lukas, thanks for the fast response. I was able to resolve t...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-427765
In reply to Philipp. Thanks for your message. Yes, it's still relevant. There will be a n...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-427764
Hello Lukas Thanks for this excellent Blog Post and the detailed explanations on how to implement row-level security with a visit listener. I know, this is an older Post and was wondering, if thi...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-427763
In reply to Thomas. Excellent, would love to see that in action! :-)
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-303745
Hi Lukas, thanks four your response. In the meantime I have a working solution. To avoid the complex query modification. I'm using the table mapping of the configuration to redirect from the norm...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-303473
In reply to Thomas. Thank you very much for your message. The VisitListener SPI was desig...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-299526
Hi, inspired from this example we implemented row level constraints in our project and it works perfectly. Thanks! Based on this we also tried to use it for reading history tables with a second V...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-298767
In reply to Ken. I'm happy to hear that you were able to fix this. If you need any additi...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-235832
In reply to lukaseder. Thanks for your fast reply, Lukas. We debugged our row constraint ...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-233920
In reply to Ken. Thanks for your message. Is that an assumption of yours or did you try t...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-232007
We are currently using jOOQ 3.11 in our project. Inspired by this blog post we also implemented our own row level security with jOOQ. We are not sure if we have implemented something wrong, but w...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-231510
In reply to Gunder rader (@IoRader). I do hope that the two solutions perform equally wel...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-188999
In reply to lukaseder. I am wonder if solution based on JOOQ can be faster than DB, becau...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-188995
In reply to Gunder rader (@IoRader). It is almost always better to use the features in yo...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-188789
If I use PostgreSQL, and it supports row level security, is it better to use jooq for this?
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-188191
In reply to Jonathan Rochette (@JoRochette).
I am using a new DefautDSLContex...https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-133365
I am using a new DefautDSLContext for every queries and and then set the a new VisitListener in the context : context.configuration().set(DefaultVisitListenerProvider.providers(new AccountIdFilte...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-133362
In reply to Jonathan Rochette (@JoRochette). Thanks for the feedback! Hmm, hard to say, I...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-133356
Hi, I just used this to implement row-level security in my application. I refactored the code a little bit to make it more compatible with our standards and moved the 'condtions' and 'wheres' sta...
https://blog.jooq.org/implementing-client-side-row-level-security-with-jooq/#comment-133354