New Stuff - a report looking at "super linearity" in more Jens Forster articles: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Lm6NdvGIQbamlhVlpESmQwZTA/view I maintain that coding "low" as "-1", "medium" a...
Sara: "I did not know that. It does make me wonder, if someone would deliberately tweak an existing data set, wouldn’t he or she try to monitor the resulting data for non-random patterns and be...
In reply to Thom. PS In above I assume effect of X on Y is monotonic and, whe...
This is a reply to jrc above. The analysis of Forster's data is really a variant on the Simonsohn-style anomaly detection. The idea is always to look for properties that real data from the contex...
In reply to Thom. @jrc Here is how I picture your argument (caveat, not havin...
In reply to Thom. "I should just let this go" . . . that attitude is contrary...
In reply to Thom. "All the studies have the same n with no missing data" Why ...
In reply to zbicyclist. Yes, I think the authors realize that the graphs were...
For me this blogpost by Neuroskeptic made a lot of sense: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2014/05/28/explaining-jens-data/#.U6rPMo2Swah It concludes that fabrication of the data is...
In reply to question. Just echoing question's recommendation and saying lots ...
In reply to b. Yes, that's a weak argument. It's possible that there were oth...
In reply to Shravan Vasishth. My assessment is that intelligent people with i...
In reply to question. So what does this entail? It seems to me to be a near ...
In reply to Shravan Vasishth. My post below was meant as a response to this p...
"In this fashion a zealous and clever investigator can slowly wend his way through a tenuous nomological net-work, performing a long series of related experiments which appear to the uncritical r...
Watching all these guys' careers crash and burn makes me think that we should be explicitly teaching our students not to stand for any one thing. If you end up in a position where you have to "ta...
In reply to jrc. JRC, If I understand you correctly I think we are in agreeme...
In reply to Mayo. Mayo, I would appreciate it if you provided opinion on my p...
Here's a pic of Forster and a fair amount of material on the fraud busting w/ links: http://errorstatistics.com/2014/05/10/who-ya-gonna-call-for-statistical-fraudbusting-r-a-fisher-p-values-and-e...
It appears that a number of people need to look up what the word bully means.
In reply to Phil. Phil, I don't understand. _Conditional_ on Nature not doing...
In reply to jrc. JRC, It is the only way to interpret thier figure 3, which s...
In reply to jrc. JRC, Read it closer. They took examples from the literature ...
Low = -1 ; Medium = 0; High=1. I get that M should be between L/H in theory - but honestly, I can't believe that M falls between L/H for ALL the papers they look at, including the controls. That ...
In reply to question. Ah, OK. Yes, I agree that looking for another explanati...
In reply to Martin. Martin, Sorry for the confusion. I gathered your intent. ...
That report AG cites keeps harping on the fact that the sex distribution of the sample (slightly more women) does not exactly match the sex distribution of psychology students (72% women). But wh...
In reply to question. question, My "criticim" wasn't aimed at the substabce o...
In reply to Martin. Martin, Look at their figure 2. It appears 3/16 (Lerouge_...
In reply to Rahul. I was once wildly impressed with an r = 1.0 until I realis...