In reply to Ned Heller. "I would like bosses to be able to fire examiners who issue clearly invalid pat...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-293064
In reply to Abstraction. Abstraction, Do not misunderstand - I do not call for regulation of view point...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292943
In reply to Night Writer. It's better than shutting out such comments entirely. While there are certain...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292935
In reply to MM. More disruptive nonsense from MM.
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292897
In reply to MM. Just more garbage from the paid blogger MM. It is pretty clear that his intent is to di...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292895
In reply to MM. Malcolm, Brush aside your smarmy (and ineffectual) ad hominem and you have yet to make ...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292731
In reply to Joachim Martillo. What does the applicant do if those involved in the enhanced quality a...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292728
In reply to g0 arthur. Thanks go! That is in the spirit of being fair minded.
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292724
In reply to anon. Note that the SAWS termination announcement http://www.uspto.gov/patent/initiatives/p...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292716
In reply to Joachim Martillo. While on the one hand we should give credit where credit is due (thank yo...
https://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/04/class-action-lawsuit.html#comment-292690