Sanger's reporting are representative of the efforts of what I call the Treason Lobby in the U.S. Congress and media. It is composed of people who are attentive only to what Israel wants and not ...
In reply to Richard Steven Hack<...
This article was written by David Sanger. So its NOT an "error" - it's deliberate Israeli propaganda. Sanger has NEVER written an article on Iran that wasn't biased against Iran and consisted mos...
Here's a website that tracks changes because the NYT doesn't. They say no change in the article so far. The more I look at that article, the mo...
In reply to Tony Papert. . E...
In reply to Jim White. It st...
In reply to Cheryl Rofer. . ...
In reply to orionATL. You're...
This NYTimes piece by David Sanger in May 2010 illustrates what he thought of that Iran nuclear ag...
In reply to Don Bacon. thank...
Rofer: People focus on enrichment and they don’t know the technical part,.. . Yes. Many people don't know that the presence of highly enriched uranium, in a gaseous state, mistakenly cal...
Many are suggesting Republican victories today with a potential takeover of the Senate with could heighten the Senate's power to reject any treaty with Iran which would allow enrichment. . That p...
Regarding this "major breakthrough in the negotiations" we've heard this song before, in 2010, with Obama backtracking on his support for Iran LEU export because Israel objected. . Following a me...
Interesting that it hasn't been fixed. The Times is not shy about changing its articles while retaining the URL.
In reply to Cheryl Rofer. . ...
Thanks for the credit, Jim! As I said last night, I'm not inclined to make a big deal of the "enrich" part of that article. I know that Sanger should know better, but there would be a series of e...