Comments on: How my DOM fuzzer ignores known bugs

First bug on the list now fixed! :)

https://www.squarefree.com/2010/11/21/how-my-dom-fuzzer-ignores-known-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-8386

A full list of bugs found through fuzzing would show that about 80% have been fixed. It's only depressing if you focus on the unfixed bugs ;)

https://www.squarefree.com/2010/11/21/how-my-dom-fuzzer-ignores-known-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-8320

It's sad to see all those bugs assigned to nobody...

https://www.squarefree.com/2010/11/21/how-my-dom-fuzzer-ignores-known-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-8319

I occasionally pre-test a big patch (e.g. harfbuzz) or pref flip (e.g. html5.enable). But mostly I test mozilla-central debug builds straight from Tinderbox.

https://www.squarefree.com/2010/11/21/how-my-dom-fuzzer-ignores-known-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-8316

Do you try fuzz testing builds with the proposed patches?

https://www.squarefree.com/2010/11/21/how-my-dom-fuzzer-ignores-known-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-8315

Nice! But it's sad to have to implement these kinds of mechanisms-- people should just fix reported bugs quickly :). We don't have any of this kind of stuff and basically just stop testing a comp...

https://www.squarefree.com/2010/11/21/how-my-dom-fuzzer-ignores-known-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-8307