There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
I was just sent this in my email. Knowing nothing about it, and unable to comment, it’s here in my Rejected Posts alternative blog. I’m keen to hear what others, familiar with it, think of th...
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Facts are true claims, in contrast with mere opinions, or normative claims. John Cook supplies this “stat fact”: scientist do and do not want subjective posterior probabilities. Which is it? ...
I extracted some illuminating gems from the recent discussion on my”Error Statistics Philosophy” blogpost, but I don’t have time to write them up, and won’t for a bit, so I’m parking a ...
Sit down with students or friends and ask them what’s wrong with this study–or just ask yourself–and it will likely leap out. Now I’ve only read the paper quickly, and know nothing of oxy...
In Fisher (1955) : “it is a fallacy, so well known as to be a standard example, to conclude from a test of significance that the null hypothesis thereby established; at most it may be said to b...
How to interpret subjective Bayesians who want to be hard-nosed Bayesians is often like swimming round and round in a funnel of currents where there’s nothing to hold on to. Well, I think I’v...
I saw some tweets last night alluding to a technique for Bayesian forensics, the basis for which published papers are to be retracted: So far as I can tell, your paper is guilty of being fraudul...
In an op-ed in the NYT Sunday Review (May 24, 2015), “Infidelity Lurks in Your Genes,” Richard Friedman states that: We have long known that men have a genetic, evolutionary impulse to cheat,...