I think they'll find out the hard way when pools start to ignore their transactions. Some already have. Its just a shame they can't work for the common good, instead of just grabbing for money.
Fair enough, but my main point still stands. If bitcoin cant handle s.dice it cant handle any kind of mainstream 21st century traffic.
Mt. Gox doesn't send transactions as a signaling service from their platform. But, you'd know this if you had researched the matter. I don't want control - I'd just rather not see the "Tragedy ...
correct, also 25% is the return you get, if you are not reinvesting the dividends.
No actually that analogy is abhorently incorrect. Im merely saying s.dice is a good test of the network potential. mt.gox is a huge burden on the blockchain as well, they are about profit as well...
That's like saying "I filled up your car with concrete to make sure it was water-tight." I didn't want you to do that. I want to use my car. Let the system gain its 'legs' on an organic basis, no...
Thanks for posting it to reddit. It never occurs to me to do so... Did you see we're off to a horrible start to the month ?
I missed that, but yes I'm more related to the EV line (red) than the black one, thanks ! (all credits go to dooglus who provide almost all the data in the thread).
You can see the impact of the 1280 BTC win on the month's profit graph: http://i.imgur.com/qoc0S5B.png It's the vertical drop part way through 24th Feb.
> This month the big whale(s) that lost thousands bitcoins (bet from > 200 to 500) in december and januray didn't show up. That's not quite true. He showed up for the first ...
If we expect bitcoin to handle large amounts of mainstream use s.dice is probably the best tool for preparing the network for this.
Satoshi Dice is an elaborate delay-of-service attack, which you pay for in the time it takes to sync the bitcoin client for the first time, or when you need to get up to date after not running it...
It's the dividend that makes it worthwhile. I could not have times my purchase more poorly (I am literally the guy who bought at the highest possible price shortly before EV released underpriced ...
You're wrong and right. This month the big whale(s) that lost thousands bitcoins (bet from 200 to 500) in december and januray didn't show up. But otherwise here are the figures with "regulars"...
Agreed... I just meant those are the risks. Not "those are the risks as compared to other bitcoin companies." I would agree the risks are smaller for satoshidice than some other bitcoin companies...
Actually, the profit went down 7k because a whale stopped playing. This person was responsible for abnormally high earnings in December and January. February's earnings are more representative of...
25% annual return is excellent!
That's not unique to SatoshiDice. Every single Bitcoin company that allows you to buy shares carry the same risks. In the end, you have to make a leap of faith that the operators are trustworthy....
It looks like there are 100,000,000 shares and the current market price per share is about 0.0064 .. which implies a market cap of 640,000 BTC and a February dividend of 13333.24628 BTC => 25% a ...
So no one bets big anymore, I stand corrected
I can't figure out the details... can someone tell me what % the monthly dividend works out to? (i.e. how many BTC did a person get in dividend for every BTC in satoshidice stock?)
I bet it likes to feel needed.
It's still hard to say whether S.DICE is better than hoarding btc if the profit in btc keep shrinking.
Not exactly, the number of bets is increasing day over day, a bit exponentially: http://i.imgur.com/v43HMGc.png source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80312.msg1554275#msg1554275
Think of the block chain, oh god why?!
January saw a lot of play from a few whale's, dooglus analysis seems to show the whale's are not playing as much this month and they still had a better month than last month. That was also with s...
Yes indeed - less bets with greater value per bet. But "high rollers" have always been where the profit margin is in gambling.
Like it or not that number means less bets placed, they need to lower minimum bet
Thank you for this post. And just to clarify before the SD haters swoop in, yes, we all know the sheer number of bitcoins profited went down in number by about 7k. This is bitcoin's deflationary ...