Comments on: Fixing Bad Astrophotography II: Imaging Mars with Mathematica

Thank you for another nice post. Very helpful for users like me trying to use Mathematica for Image Processing.

https://blog.wolfram.com/2014/08/14/fixing-bad-astrophotography-ii-imaging-mars-with-mathematica/#comment-120663

What kind of results could I expect using a Canon 1100D and a 6" Newt mounted on a EQ5 Pro? many thanks

https://blog.wolfram.com/2014/08/14/fixing-bad-astrophotography-ii-imaging-mars-with-mathematica/#comment-89926

Martin, thanks for catching that problem with the blog post. It was a cut-and-paste error that has now been fixed, along with several other typos. I've covered image deconvolution in an earlier b...

https://blog.wolfram.com/2014/08/14/fixing-bad-astrophotography-ii-imaging-mars-with-mathematica/#comment-46183

Nice post. Instead of Sharpen you can also use ImageDeconvolve and try various methods it supports. You can get a clearer image sometimes. I think there is a mistake towards the end, you posted t...

https://blog.wolfram.com/2014/08/14/fixing-bad-astrophotography-ii-imaging-mars-with-mathematica/#comment-46055

Cool! Well done.

https://blog.wolfram.com/2014/08/14/fixing-bad-astrophotography-ii-imaging-mars-with-mathematica/#comment-46008